NCIEO Home Page (Map): Continuing Communications: Ask the Chief:

ASK THE CHIEF
10/01/98

(Also available from Starland mirror site)

First, some comments from previous columns . . . (Oh, by the way, this is probably the last Ask the Chief in this format. When I get back from vacation I will probably start a round-table-type discussion on my new discusssion board called "The Kitchen Sink" and that will replace this to save me a bit of time. And to Steven Walker I say . . . sorry about that!) 


Bullies on the Playground and the End of the Nitpicker's Guides
Beginning with Phil Farrand's comments at the end of the 5/15/98 column

Chris Franz: I very recently discovered your website now that I am online, and I sent you a nit last week to join the guild, and was really looking forward to seeing a Voyager nitpicking guide on it's way, or any other nitpicking guide coming out, but I guess that won't be happening. I am glad you are taking it as well as you are, and I hope you realize that a lot of people won't be happy, but as you say to fight something like this would take way too much money. I just thought I'd drop you a note to let you know, and also, if this website is still around when the new season picks up, I will certainly try to put my two cents in. Good luck with whatever you do.

Lee Jamilkowski: Please say it ain't so! Please! Don't leave us. We love you. We need you to continue on. If you are serious about leaving, at least choose an appropriate replacement. There is so much to nitpick, but so little time. I hadn't thought that "Godzilla" was THAT bad of a movie, but apparently is... for different reasons than anyone ever could have thought. Maybe some Guild "leaders' can continue Guild books....who knows? Please don't leave us!

Phil: I'm not leaving! I just have to cut down the amount of time that I spent on the site because I have business things to do! So, I've had some people volunteer to help and I'll be contacting them to help me run the discussion boards when I get back from vacation.


No Chaplain For Star Trek
Beginning with the comments of Chris Ashley in the 8/21/98 Column

Ed Watson I know it's been a while, but I now have my OWN computer to email you with. No more using the library. I've been following your "religion and Star Trek" line in the ask the chief column, and I think I have remembered one item that hasn't been mentioned. In "Data's Day", Data is making a log entry about the normal ship activities going on that day. I am certain I remember him mentioning a "Hindu festival of lights". I don't know if that is a real Hindu festival, but I'm sure I remember him saying that. Do you recall this? It would certainly give cause to believe that religion is alive and well in the 24th century. Happy Nitpicking!

Phil: I *do* recall that! And some religions *are* alive and well in the 24th century (at least according to Trek). It's the monotheistic ones that seem to suffer! Hmmm.

Commodore Josh K: About the humanistic philosophy that pervades the STAR TREK universe: If Gene Roddenberry himself decreed that no belief in God was necessary in the future, it implies that the United Federation of Planets also has a human(oid)istic philosophy. The deeply spiritual Bajorans need to consider this before they agree to join the Federation. Recall Vedek Winn's seemingly extreme religious views on DS9's first-season finale, which I believe was called "In the Hands of the Prophets." At one point, she tells Commander Sisko, "You and your Federation exist in a universe of darkness, and you would drag us in there with you, but we will not go." She was wrong to suggest that the Federation is evil, per se, but if she meant to suggest that it is a godless organization, she may have been right. Once the war is over, Bajor probably will join the Federation, but when they do, they may run the risk of seeing the religious foundation of their society weakened.


The Rumor Of A New Trek Series
Beginning with the comments of Glenn St. Germain in the 9/4/98 Column

Faith McClenny: My own opinion is that Paramount should really wait and see how Voyager does on its own before even thinking of doing another Trek show.


Voyager Battle Bridge
Beginning with the comments of Jeff Zimmer in the 9/11/98 Column

Nicholas Setzer Regarding Jeff Zimmer's question as to if Voyager has a battle bridge... As I understand the ship is so small it can't even separate. If it could then I imagine they'd do that before landing the entire thing (RE:saves energy and puts less of the crew in danger). I really haven't any specific dialog supporting the fact that they can't separate but I'm sure somewhere in the first episode they must mention something.

Plus we've never really seen any place where it would be possible to separate because I don't see any impulse engines on (what could be considered) the "saucer section" for which it could move.

Commodore Josh K I have a response to Jeff Zimmer's question about the presence of a battle bridge on Voyager: Voyager probably was not built with a battle bridge, because the Intrepid-class starship's small size makes separation impractical. But the ship designers, being eminently practical, must have included some kind of auxiliary control room (in case another Doomsday Machine were to appear, and destroy Voyager's main bridge as its would-be predecessor did to the USS Constellation). Engineering may be considered an auxiliary control room; in the TNG episode "Brothers", when Data tampered with the environmental controls in order to force Picard and the bridge crew out, they went to Engineering and tried to reestablish controlfrom there.

BTW, I have a comment of my own about Voyager: Why doesn't Captain Janeway refer to her ship as "The Voyager" as Jean-Luc Picard refers to his ship as "The Enterprise"?

Phil: Just doesn't have that same ring, does it?


The Bozeman in "All Good Things..."
Beginning with the comments of Richard Poythress in the 9/11/98 Column

Charles Cabe: About last weeks comments about the Bozeman, why can't they use it in a fight. The Soyuz-class is almost identicle to the Miranda-class (Reliant), and I recall seeing a Miranda in ST:8. But, the real question is: why was the Soyuz class scrapped and the Mirandas are used throughout TNG and DS9? Thus far, the Bozeman is the only Soyuz class ship to appear anywhere.

Patrick Sweeney: IN response to Richard Poythress's comments on the Bozeman, I haven't personally, but if you read, I think it is "Ship of the Line" or soemthing, they explain the Bozeman is suitable for modern day use. Even if you ignore the book, which of course is non-canon material, it makes since that the bozeman would remain in service. Physically, the ship is very new, newer then the E-D when it was released form the time loop. And, as LaForge points out in "Relics", most technology hasn't changed much in the past 75 years.

 


On to the questions . . .

Leeder: Did you ever get around to seeing "The Avengers"? The reviews were resoundingly negative.

Phil: Nope and Yup! (In that order . . . I'm waiting for the video.)

Jason Allan Haase: This week the Sci-Fi Channel showed the Classic Star Trek episode "The Menagerie" parts I and II. My question is this: Was the original pilot "The Cage" filmed in color or black and white? The clips used from it for the two part episode are in color, but for some reason I had it in my head that the original pilot was in black and white. If they were in B/W, what did they do, colorize them?

Phil: If I recall correctly, the original pilot was in color but the only surviving print (aside from the footage in Menagerie, parts 1 and 2) was black and white and that's probably the reason you remember it in black and white because there were significant portions that were broadcast in black and white when the Cage finally premiered in the late 70s (I think that's whe it premiered!)

Patrick Sweeney I don't know if anyone else around here collects Star Trek CCG cards from Decipher, but in the alternate universe card set there is a card for Paul Rice, from the episode Arsenal of Freedom. On the side of the card, next to the copyright, it says "Paul is Dead". Personally, I agree, but does anyone else recall if they ever said that Riker's buddy was dead? I think they only said that the ship was missing.

Phil: As far as I can recall, they were only presumed dead. Maybe that's good enough for Trek these days! (Did Rice wear a red uniform?)

Marco A. Riojas My friends and I were discussing the fact that the Defiant has a cloaking device. I know the Treaty of Algeron says the Federation is not supposed to have one. How was the treaty bypassed? Was it annulled, or conveniently ignored? Is there anywhere I can find the text of the Treaty of Algeron?

 Phil: Couldn't tell ya where to find the text of the treaty. It probably doesn't exist! As to how the Defiant can has a cloaking device. Well, this *is* Trek. The creators rewrite their own rules all the time!

Commodore Josh K: I noticed that in the Sept. 11 column, Jason Barnes said that Jonathan Frakes made some sort of comments about the Nitpicker's Guides during the filming of First Contact. Any idea what he might have said about them?

Phil: I believe Frakes made a comment about nitpickers in general, not the guides in specific.

Nicholas Setzer I just have one comment about Scott F. Newton's comment about the probability of Seven of Nine being the borg chosen. Let's just take any one event in perspective, such as me sitting here typing this comment to you. Well if we look at the probability of me sitting here typing this message we see that there are about (at least) 1,000,000+ things that I could otherwise be doing. Also the fact that I even ended up here is spectacular if you view it through the eyes of probability. Yet here I am right now right here typing up the message when any minute even could have prevented me from doing so. So even though the probability of one particular event happening is infinitesimally small we must agree that one does happen (but is there something special about that event? I think scientists argue over that stuff all the time). Anyway through all that all I'm trying to say is that it isn't *so* outrageous that Seven of Nine was chosen.

Phil: Could be!

Tony Forbes: I just noticed something extremely odd in the Star Trek Chronology(revised edition). I was looking up a Voyager episode when I came across the entry in the index for Dr. Pulaski. Here's how it goes.Pulaski, Katherine( Enterprise-D medical officer) dicusses plasma plauge, 91, 132; cares for Riker, Kile, 111; joines Enterprise-D crew, 132; discusses Lantree crew health, 134; leaves Enterprise-D crew, 140; notes on, 276; falls down elevator shaft, 444 Everything looks fine... except for the last entry. There are, after all, only 342 pages in the Star Trek Chronology revised edition! Here's what I think happened: They never explained Pulaski's departure on the show. What happened was on a mission, Pulaski was somehow transported to a planet in the distant future, but with a technology level close to our own. While there, she fell down an elevator shaft. Meanwhile, Starfleet covered the whole deal up. I think the Chronology writers were trying to hint at this story line here! ;-)

Phil: It's an inside joke. Kate Mulgrew (Pulaksi) also starred on LA Law during that time frame as a gripey old lawyer (does the "gripey" part sound familiar). She fell down an elevator shaft on that show and died.

SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!! SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!!SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!!SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!!SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!!SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!!SPOILERS AHEAD FOR THE NEW MOVIE. AVERT YOU EYES IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ THEM!!!

Joshua Truax: Chief... With all the buzz on the Web about the next Star Trek movie, I'm amazed that it hasn't made its way to Nitpicker Central yet (at least, as far as I've seen)! So... I'll do the honors and cast the first stone. The premise of the movie is that a misguided Starfleet admiral has made a devil's pact with a race called the Son'a, in order to secretly move another race called the Bak'u off their homeworld to another planet, a la Nikolai Rozhenko and the Boralans in "Homeward" [TNG]. When Picard and company realize what the admiral and his friends are up to, they mutiny against the admiral and move to stop the Son'a from carrying out their plan. The reason the admiral and the Son'a are so interested in the Bak'u planet is because something about its ecosystem inhibits and can even reverse the aging process in its inhabitants. In other words, the planet's quite literally a fountain of youth.

A fountain of youth? So what? Maybe the Son'a have a good reason to be interested in such a planet, but as every nitpicker who's read the original TNG Guide knows, the Federation has been sitting on its own fountain of youth for years now -- in its own transporters! (See the reviews for "Unnatural Selection" and "Rascals".) You remember the drill: Take a DNA sample of yourself on your 18th birthday. Then, when you hit middle age, or whenever you feel like you're getting too old, just plug the DNA sample into the transporter pattern buffer, run yourself through the transporter, and -- ba-da-BING! -- you've got the body of an 18-year-old again! As far as anyone knows, you could do this ad infinitum, as long as you didn't get killed in the years between your rejuvenation cycles.

Phil: Didn't I mention that in one of the NextGen Guides (Grin.)

Michael McMaster I think I've finally come up with a reasonable explination of the accent problem on ALL of the ST:TNG and later shows and movies. I'm not a rabid watcher (I work strange hours and so catch the show when I can), however, I've never seen this theory compromised. If someone is speaking accented english, they are actually speaking english. The universal translator leaves their voice alone, and so their accent remains untouched. Thus, Troi speaks english with a BETAZOID accent. Just as her mother would if her mother spoke english (honestly, can you imagine Deanna's mother bothering to learn a language?). Another good way to tell is that they occasionally say something that the translator balks at (Klingon phrases that Worf thentranslates for the viewer, oops, I mean, crew) Examples to follow:

Picard: Speaks english with a British accent (likely because he would have learned english from the closest source to his come country, England).

Riker: Speaks english with a strong American accent (audible to my Canadian ears)

Troi: Speaks english with a thick Betaziod accent.

Worf: Speaks Klingon. Translator flattens out his accent just as it does to all Klingons. He would have learned Klingon as a child, and probably speaks it exclusivly, with a thick Russian accent. This makes him instantly recognizable to other Klingons. This is why his parents speak english with thick accents, but Worf does not.

Data: N/A. He speaks at least two languages fluently. English would be one of them. Probably switches languages to conform to whomever he's with. Or not. Universal translators and all.

The Crushers: American English.

Geordi: American english.

O'Brian: English with an Irish accent.

And so on. It covers how Kira could have learned perfect, unaccented english, while Bashir, who was born on earth still speaks with a pronounced accent. It takes care of Worf's lack of an accent. And Mrs.Troi's. With a universal translator, there may be no need to learn the language of your fellow crew members, or even your spouse. Deanna grew up speaking Betaziod at home, and learned english as a second language from her father. Betazed is a recent induction into the Federation, so I would imagine that Galactic Standard (english) hasn't had much of a chance to catch on.

 Can you think of any characters that would throw this theory out the window?

 Phil: Um, honestly . . . right at the moment . . . it's getting late and I need to go to bed! Anybody?

Chris David I'm not sure if you answered these before, if you have then apologies as I could not them. Anyway I have two questions/beefs...

1) How , 800 years ago, did the ancient Bajorans get their solar sail ships (as seen in The Explorers) into space in the first place? and  2) In epsiodes like the Die is Cast and Way of the Warrior, how does a fleet of cloaked ships keep from crashing into each other?

 Phil: 1.) Big giant slingshots 2.) Big giant airbags

Vicious I guess I haven't been paying much attention to the opening credits for DS9, but isn't Captain Sisko's father now being played by Brock Peters (Or is it Peter Brock?) who also played Admiral Cartright from Star Trek IV and VI? Just wondering.

 Phil: That's the guy!

Vicki Strzembosz: I hope the new job is going well. I just started reading the fifth Captains' Table novel and I noticed that in the background of the cover art there was a picture that looked a great deal like Peter David. I looked at the covers of the other novels in the series,and they all have a similar cover. Each one has a picture in the center of the Captain who is the main character and people in the background who are supposed to represent other captains in the bar. Since Peter David is the only one of the authors I have ever met, I don't know if each cover has a representation of the author. Does anyone know? (It would be sort of a Hitchcock type thing. He appeared somewhere in all his movies, but was not always easy to spot.)

Phil: Couldn't tell ya! Anyone?

Have a great weekend, everybody!


If you would like to submit a question or comment, send it to: chief@nitcentral.com with "Ask the Chief" or "Question" in the Subject line. (Remember the legalese: Everything you submit becomes mine and you grant me the right to use your name in any future publication by me.)

Copyright 1998 by Phil Farrand. All rights reserved.